In today’s digital age, protecting minors from age-restricted content has become an increasingly important concern. Age verification systems are essential tools for ensuring compliance with regulations designed to prevent minors from accessing inappropriate content or services. This article explores the key differences between user-based age verification and device-based age verification methods, examining the advantages and characteristics of each approach.
What is Age Verification?
Age verification tools are developed to follow minimum age regulations to ensure that minors do not gain access to age-restricted content, services, or products. These tools play a crucial role in preventing minors from engaging in activities such as viewing inappropriate content, gambling, purchasing alcohol and other age-restricted activities.
User-Based Age Verification
User-based age verification controls and verifies the age of an individual user, regardless of the device they are using. This approach typically involves user-specific credentials and identity checks.
How It Works
Users must create accounts on websites or apps, providing personal information including their date of birth. Verification can be completed using government-issued ID scans, credit card authorizations, or other forms of identity verification.
Advanced authentication methods such as biometric age verification (e.g., fingerprints or facial recognition) can be used to confirm the identity and age of the user.
Some platforms may require periodic re-verification to ensure continued compliance with age restrictions, particularly for content or services that minors might often try to access.
Advantages of User-Based Age Verification
- Precision: User-based verification is highly precise, as it directly confirms the age of the individual user rather than relying on device settings. This method ensures only eligible users access age-restricted content.
- Flexibility: This method allows users to access age-restricted content from any device, as the verification is tied to the user’s account rather than to a specific device.
- Enhanced Security: Advanced verification methods, such as biometrics, add an additional layer of security, making it difficult for minors to bypass restrictions.
- Compliance and Accountability: User-based verification provides a clear audit trail, making it easier for companies to prove compliance with age verification laws and regulations. It also holds users accountable for providing the correct information.
Device-Based Age Verification
Device-based age verification restricts access based on the device’s settings or data, applying age restrictions to all users of a particular device.
How It Works
Devices such as smartphones, tablets, and gaming consoles often come equipped with built-in parental control features. These controls allow parents to set age limits for app usage, content access, and purchases.
Internet service providers (ISPs) and network administrators can implement age verification measures at the network level. This can include filtering content and restricting access to certain websites based on the age profile associated with the device or network account.
Some devices allow users to create multiple profiles, each with its own age settings. This is particularly useful in households with children, where parents can create child profiles with proper restrictions.
Advantages of Device-Based Age Verification
- User-Friendly: Device-based verification is easy for parents to manage. Controls can be set once and applied across multiple applications and services.
- Consistent: By applying age restrictions at the device level, it ensures a uniform protection standard across all apps and services used on the device.
- Parental Control: Device-based controls empower parents to effectively manage and monitor their children’s online activities, while customizing settings based on their child’s age and maturity level.
- Enhanced Privacy: This method requires less personal data collection compared to user-based verification.
Key Differences between User-Based and Device-Based Age Verification
Implementation: Device-based verification is implemented at the hardware or network level, while user-based verification is tied to individual accounts and identities.
Scope: Device-based methods apply restrictions across all users of one device, while user-based methods restrict individuals.
User Experience: Device-based verification is less intrusive for users, while user-based verification may ask users to share their private information repeatedly.
Data Privacy: User-based verification collects and stores more personal data, which can raise privacy concerns. Device-based verification requires less personal data collection.
While device-based age verification offers significant privacy advantages, there are some disadvantages:
- Technological Limitations: Implementing effective age verification at the device level can be technically challenging and may require advanced features that not all devices support.
- User Compliance: Compliance is dependent on the proper configuration of parents.
- Consistency Across Platforms: Device-based verification may not provide the same level of consistency as user-based methods, particularly for services accessed across multiple devices and platforms.
Legal and Regional Considerations
Age verification methods vary by region, influenced by local privacy laws and cultural preferences. User-based verification has become a standard requirement in many legal jurisdictions, while device-based verification is gaining attention as a privacy-friendly alternative.
Some countries and regions already encourage privacy-friendly age verification.
European Union (EU)
The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) emphasizes data protection, shaping age verification practices across Europe. While the GDPR does not mandate specific methods, it encourages privacy-preserving solutions, supporting the adoption of device-based methods that limit data collection.
Japan
Japan’s regulatory framework encourages privacy-friendly solutions, including the use of device-based parental controls to restrict access to age-inappropriate content. This approach aligns with cultural and regulatory emphasis on privacy protection.
South Korea
South Korea has a well-developed framework for protecting minors online, particularly in the gaming sector. The country employs stringent age verification laws but also promotes the use of privacy-preserving technologies. Gaming consoles and other devices often come with parental control features that can be configured to restrict access based on age, thus minimizing the need for personal data collection.
Spain
Spain has taken a more controversial approach, introducing laws that require adult sites to verify users’ ages through government-issued IDs (DNI, NIE or passport). While intended to protect minors, this regulation has sparked concerns over privacy and data misuse.
The law in Spain is nicknamed “Pajaporte”, combining “paja” (masturbation) with “pasaporte” (passport).
United Kingdom
The UK’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (also known as the Children’s Code) introduced by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) encourages the use of privacy-preserving age verification methods. While it does not explicitly mandate device-based verification, it emphasizes the need for minimal data collection and the protection of children’s privacy, which has led some platforms to adopt device-based solutions.
United States
In the U.S., privacy concerns play a significant role in regulatory discussions. Laws like the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) focus on obtaining parental consent for data collection from children under 13, prompting the use of device-based controls in consumer electronics. This has led to increased adoption of device-based controls, especially in consumer electronics and gaming consoles.
Emerging Privacy-Preserving Technologies
Globally, there is a growing focus on developing privacy-preserving age verification technologies.
AI-Based Solutions: Using AI to estimate a user’s age based on non-invasive metrics without storing personal data.
Edge Computing: Implementing age verification processes directly on devices (e.g., smartphones, gaming consoles) so that personal data does not need to be transmitted or stored by third parties.
Blockchain: Some propose using blockchain technology for age verification, where users could have a secure, encrypted digital identity that can be verified without revealing personal information.
Parental Control Software: Increasingly sophisticated parental control applications that allow parents to set age restrictions and check their children’s activities without extensive data collection.
Conclusion
User-based and device-based age verification methods serve different purposes and offer unique advantages. Device-based verification is ideal for families, providing consistency across multiple services with enhanced privacy. User-based verification, on the other hand, offers greater precision and is better suited for platforms requiring strict compliance and security. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, a combination of these approaches may provide the most comprehensive solution, balancing the protection of minors with privacy and convenience.
This article was written by @SandeCopywriter on behalf of Segpay, your payment processor with in-house expertise about age verification.
If you have any further questions about legislation in your jurisdiction and the best solutions available to cater your specific business needs, please contact our experts via: [email protected]
**************
